A shocking act of violence unfolded in the Brewerytown neighborhood of Philadelphia on Saturday night when retired Navy commander Scott Harris was brutally mugged while walking his dog. The assault has raised serious questions about neighborhood safety, policing, and residents' complaints, turning the spotlight on how local governments respond to such criminal acts.
The Assault
Harris suffered grievous injuries requiring over 100 stitches, a brain injury, broken teeth, and extensive bruising to his face. Despite his yearlong service in war-torn Iraq and two years in Ukraine, Harris never expected such violence in his own community (Fox News, "Navy vet brutally mugged in Philadelphia while walking his dog, gets 100 stitches," August 30, 2023). The assault took place near a local playground where a large party was underway. The attacker or attackers remain unidentified, having absconded with Harris' wallet, ID, and credit cards.
Local Response and Police Accountability
The incident brings to light concerns about inadequate policing. According to Harris and his partner, Joseph Hurchick, the local police have not adequately addressed multiple complaints about large, unruly crowds in the area. Their worries echo broader issues regarding the role and effectiveness of community policing and how governments address citizen complaints (Fox News, August 30, 2023).
Legal Commentary: A Law Professor's Perspective
While this incident stands as a grim testament to the state of neighborhood safety in Brewerytown, it also offers an opportunity to reexamine the legal frameworks surrounding similar issues.
The 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, often a cornerstone of discussions around policing. In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified the legal scope for stop-and-frisk procedures. According to the Terry doctrine, an officer may perform a quick surface search if they believe a person is armed and presently dangerous. But the societal debate continues: How do we balance effective policing with 4th Amendment protections?
Also relevant is the role of "Broken Windows Policing," a theory that suggests that maintaining and monitoring urban environments in a well-ordered condition may stop vandalism and prevent more severe crimes from happening. However, the effectiveness of such approaches remains controversial. Critics argue that it can lead to racial profiling and undermine community trust (Harcourt, Bernard E., and Jens Ludwig. "Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment." The University of Chicago Law Review 73.1 (2006): 271-320).
While on the subject of community involvement, the Good Samaritan Laws provide legal protection to people who give reasonable assistance to those who are injured or in peril. In this incident, three women helped Harris and his dog return home. Although Pennsylvania's Good Samaritan Law primarily focuses on medical assistance during emergencies (42 Pa. C.S. § 8332), it does highlight the community's role in assisting victims of crime.
Lastly, under Pennsylvania's criminal laws, the attacker or attackers could face multiple charges, such as aggravated assault (18 Pa. C.S. § 2702), robbery (18 Pa. C.S. § 3701), and perhaps even attempted murder, depending on the facts as they unfold.
This incident serves as a microcosm of broader social and legal issues surrounding community safety, police responsibility, and individual rights, begging for a thorough examination and response from both the legal system and the society at large.
.svg)
